Security Code Reviews.
Aptori Secure Code Reviews replace legacy SAST that was mostly based on rules and regex. Instead of matching patterns without enough context, Aptori uses control flow and data flow to understand how code actually behaves, precisely determine the security weakness, automatically establish whether it is a true positive, and recommend the best place and best way to fix it.
Why legacy SAST is not enough
Rule-based and noisy
Context-aware and precise
Security analysis that understands the code path
Control Flow Analysis
Understand branching logic, execution paths, and where security decisions are made or bypassed.
Data Flow Analysis
Trace how untrusted data moves through code and whether it reaches sensitive sinks without proper controls.
Contextual Determination
Use flow-aware context to determine the real weakness and whether the finding is actually a true positive.
Find the right weakness, not just a suspicious pattern
Go beyond detection to the best code fix
Secure Code Reviews become more powerful with AI Security Engineer
Autonomous Validation
Use AI-driven workflows to validate whether a code weakness is real and operationally relevant.
Better Prioritization
Connect code review findings to runtime and exploit context so teams know what to fix first.
Faster Remediation
Turn precise code findings into actionable remediation workflows with guided fixes.
What teams gain with Secure Code Reviews
For AppSec teams
Move beyond regex-era scanning and focus on higher-confidence, context-driven code security findings.
For developers
Get fewer noisy alerts and clearer, code-specific guidance on what to change and where to change it.
For leadership
Improve signal quality, reduce wasted engineering effort, and make secure coding workflows more effective at scale.
Questions teams ask about Secure Code Reviews
How is Aptori Secure Code Reviews different from SAST?
Aptori replaces mostly rule-based and regex-driven SAST with context-aware analysis that understands control flow, data flow, and the real code path.
Can Aptori determine if a finding is a true positive?
Yes. Aptori uses contextual analysis to determine whether the weakness is real and whether it matters in the actual execution path.
Does it tell developers how to fix the issue?
Yes. Aptori helps identify the best place to fix the issue and provides precise code-level remediation guidance.
What kinds of weaknesses benefit most from this approach?
Issues where context matters most, especially when control flow, data propagation, or the actual sink path determines whether the weakness is real or exploitable.
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
